Skalduggery

Useful Idiots as I said at my blog.

Tom

Rampaging stupidity.

From a HuffPost poster wrt another poster (http:// www. huffingtonpost. com/social/gomezrules/paul-krugman-occupy-wall-street_n_1006952_112695023.html) who hyper-linked to this silly attempt at classic logical fallacies, e.g., Ad Hominem and Red Herring.

Please see this .edu site (http:// www. csun. edu /~dgw61315/fallacies.html) to learn why you should not use logical fallacies (btw, you should know better!).

eva belle wrote (http:// www. huffingtonpost. com/social/eva_belle/paul-krugman-occupy-wall-street_n_1006952_112696880.html):

“Using your logic, where are all those things made by corporatio­ns manufactur­ed? Is it offshore? I thought so.”

Well, it looks like the .edu web site to which I hyper-linked, wrt logical fallacies my break via this blog. Thus, I used Tiny URL to circumvent the possible breakage: http://preview.tinyurl.com/45gjl

Also, here is one of my favorite web sites wrt logical fallacy and why YOU should NEVER use them like you did in that lame attempt to ‘score points’ above:

(full URL) http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/index.html#index
(Tiny URL, in case the full URL breaks via this blog) http://tinyurl.com/yeczp5q

I hope you’re man enough, and not as disingenuous as you appeaser, to allow my messages to be posted on your blog. Otherwise, you’re simply a shill who cares not for fact and proper debate.

Hey,

At least your man enough and honest enough to post my messages, even though you are dishonest enough to post such a logical fallacy filled image in the first place.

Irony overload… complaining about logical fallacies while citing a Krugman article (ignoring the Appeal to Authority fallacy made with that one)?

Putting that aside, the picture above makes a statement about the irony in protesting corporations using corporate products. Logic 101 – A fallacy is an argument in which the premises do not give the needed support for the conclusion. An argument is one or more premises followed by a conclusion. I suppose you could stretch and say the picture above is a premise but you’re still lacking a conclusion. No argument – no fallacy. Hence, shut up.